Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powercfg

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Powercfg}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powercfg}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Powercfg}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 22:22, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Powercfg]]=

:{{la|1=Powercfg}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Powercfg}})

Wikipedia is not a software instruction manual. Sandstein 22:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Sandstein 22:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

:Delete: Wikipedia is not a software instruction manual, and cleaning up this article would effectively amount to blanking it. This content is not appropriate for an encyclopedia and should be deleted. HyperAccelerated (talk) 21:20, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.