Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prateek Dhankhar

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Prateek Dhankhar}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Prateek Dhankhar}})

non notable nd fail in WP:GNG Worldiswide (talk) 02:30, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 16. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:46, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and India. Kpgjhpjm 06:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:38, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
• Delete: Simply being an attorney doesn't show notability. Existing source was to jatland, a wiki, WP:UGC and with that removed, the article is unsourced. Web search didn't turn up anything useful, merely a couple of cases where they were involved, but no significant coverage. Ravensfire (talk) 01:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
• Delete: This is classic WP:A7. Should have been speedied. The article has been made by the subject themself. Jupitus Smart 19:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
• Delete: Not notable, no significant coverage. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 06:13, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
• Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:Sigcov. Maliner (talk) 07:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:N. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 09:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
• Delete unable to locate credible sources that satisfy the criteria outlined in WP:GNG.AmusingWeasel (talk) 12:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.