Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pravegeya

=[[Pravegeya]]=

:{{la|Pravegeya}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pravegeya Stats])

:({{Find sources|Pravegeya}})

Fails WP:NFF. No sources. Harsh (talk) 15:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

:({{Find sources|Pravegaya}})

  • Comment: Well the this new article sat for 32 hours before being sent to AFD.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pravegeya&diff=512192223&oldid=511975238] Tagging for issues might have helped, as the film existed and was not unsourcable. Appears to have been completed and is simply awaiting release. Yes, the article author messed up its format and made lots of typos... inlcuding the film's name. It is NOT "Pravegeya" (with an e) but rather "Pravegaya" (with an A). I have just addressed some initial issues with the nominated stub being improperly formated and suffering from many typos.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pravegeya&diff=512331443&oldid=512192223] More to do. Input and assistance from Sri Lankan editors would be most appreciated. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:56, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep - There are some sources in the article (I didn't find any elsewhere). Given the Sri Lankan location of the topic, there probably are more sources for the topic that are not on-line. Meets WP:GNG. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 02:36, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.