Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premise (programming language)

:{{la|Premise (programming language)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Premise_(programming_language) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Premise (programming language)}})

Apparently non-notable programming language in development. The only sources that even menition it are from the developers of the program SpinningSpark 10:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

• Delete - No independent sources and no evidence of notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:41, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

• Delete - programming language (software) article of unclear notability. Refs provided either do not mention the subject, as they predate its existence, or are papers by Miller, who, as an author of the language, is not an independent source. A search turned up no independent RS coverage of this language.Dialectric (talk) 10:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

• Delete—no claim for notability, not seeing anything in the peer-reviewed literature. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 11:10, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

• Delete Same concerns as Dialectric (above) - no doubt of the language's existence however until it's covered by secondary sources it shouldn't feature. CaptRik (talk) 12:03, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

• Delete No evidence of meeting notability requirements. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

• Delete No evidence of notability. Maproom (talk) 19:15, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.