Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presstek

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Presstek}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presstek}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Presstek}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 13:32, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Presstek]]=

:{{la|Presstek}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Presstek}})

Notability tag has been on the page for 11 years, and still no notability outside of acquiring someone or being acquired by someone else. Likeanechointheforest (talk) 19:24, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:17, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:17, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:43, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.