Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primeshow Entertainment (2nd nomination)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:32, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
=[[:Primeshow Entertainment]]=
{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primeshow Entertainment}}
:{{la|1=Primeshow Entertainment}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Primeshow Entertainment}})
Fails WP:NCORP. References are trivial mentions that fail WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:BEFORE only found routine announcements and trivial mentions. VickKiang (talk) 22:00, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. VickKiang (talk) 22:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:44, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete: Under criteria WP:CSD G4 it has been deleted previously by a deletion discussion and there is no change in the article except number of films has been increased, at the time of previous discussion there was only one film and now there are three films. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️Let's Talk ! 13:39, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
::I've declined the G4 request, the previous version was completely unsourced and this one has a load of references. No opinion on whether the subject is notable. Hut 8.5 17:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
:::Agree that G4 doesn't apply. Previous version was deleted in February 2022, whereas this has lots of newer refs from October/November 2022. VickKiang (talk) 20:27, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion, so relisting for more input to a consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 22:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: My similar opinion in the first AfD said: While the company does get some incidental mentions in articles about particular films and features on Niranjan Reddy, :WP:NCORP requires that notability is demonstrable through coverage about the company. That remains the case: to the extent that the "teaser" coverage for HanuMan mentions this firm at all, it is as a postfix: "produced by Niranjan Reddy under PrimeShow Entertainment banner", etc. Passing mentions are insufficient for :WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 07:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NCORP and WP:PROMO - my search for sources also finds brief mentions and announcements, mostly in low-quality sources, and no significant coverage about the company in independent and reliable sources. Per WP:CORPDEPTH, it does not appear {{tq|possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub about the organization}} at this time. Beccaynr (talk) 19:31, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.