Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince blanket

:{{la|Prince blanket}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Prince blanket}})

PROD-contested by article creator. Unreferenced, and it's unlikely Michael Jackson's children would meet notability guidelines simply because they're his children (see WP:INHERITED). elektrikSHOOS 08:08, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

• Keep notable enough in its own right to be satirised by South Park. Jackson's kids aren't necsesarily notable, the Blanket kid is. MLA (talk) 08:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• :That would fall under WP:BLP1E, then. Being known for only one event does not usually get one a Wikipedia article. Tarc (talk) 16:20, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. This isn't even a plausible redirect, given that it doesn't contain a surname. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:55, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The baby dangling incident is adequately covered in the main article. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:00, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete - Notability is not inherited and notability for one event runs aground on WP:BLP1E issues. Not a useful or likely redirect; users can find their way to MJ's page via Prince Jackson, Prince Michael Jackson, and Prince Michael Jackson I already. Tarc (talk) 16:20, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete - no need for a separate article on a bankie that has no independent notability. It is likely to become a POV fork. Bearian (talk) 21:48, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.