Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Battles

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Princess Battles}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Battles}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Princess Battles}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:50, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Princess Battles]]=

:{{la|1=Princess Battles}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Princess Battles}})

While [https://web.archive.org/web/20150417045955/http://www.technologytell.com/gaming/110089/review-princess-battles-for-windows/ the Technology Tell review] is substantial and TT is a reliable source, the only other source I could find was [https://hardcoregamer.com/features/articles/princess-battles-looks-to-shake-up-the-dating-sim-genre-with-card-play/54473/ an announcement piece from Hardcore Gamer]. VNs Now (was used as a source in the article) is unreliable (contributor referred to by username and not real name, their "About Us" page on the current version of their site still has "insert email here" in it!). QuietCicada (talk) 01:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. QuietCicada (talk) 01:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete Does not appear to have the threshold of WP:SIGCOV required to pass WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:14, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.