Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Cassandra Windsor

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per G3 (blatant hoax).  Rebbing  17:54, 27 March 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

=[[Princess Cassandra Windsor]]=

:{{la|Princess Cassandra Windsor}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Princess_Cassandra_Windsor Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Princess Cassandra Windsor}})

This page appears to be a hoax. Some of the links listed are not publicly viewable, the rest appear to not meet WP:RS. Searching for this woman finds only a few recent web references to her (some under the name "Cassandra Hudson"), a photo that's actually of Stella Banderas, references to a seemingly non-existent upcoming film, blog posts about her supposedly appearing on an upcoming season of a TV show, etc. Several of the links, including the Everpedia one mentioned here, have all been created in the last week. This looks like someone's creating a fake web persona. At the very least it needs serious RS to be credible and establish notability. JamesG5 (talk) 09:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

: Noting that this is one of the linked sources https://www.everipedia.com/cassandra-windsor-245433912465302/ (as mentioned, only recently created), and the FB page linked there has been shut down. As can be seen here http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3193178/Melanie-Griffith-look-alike-daughter-Stella-Banderas-wear-black-outfits-Los-Angeles.html that's Stella Banderas in the photo. Here's an example of a page using some of this same questionable information and the same photo under the "Cassandra Hudson" name http://reign-cw.wikia.com/wiki/Cassandra_Hudson. The 2016 movie she's listed as appearing in also doesn't seem to exist outside of a Vimeo trailer by an apparently non-existent film studio all of whose actors & directors seem to only exist on the same web pages as Ms. Windsor. JamesG5 (talk) 09:43, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Nizolan (talk) 12:59, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. —Nizolan (talk) 12:59, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —Nizolan (talk) 12:59, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete as an apparent hoax cobbled together from self-published sources. Incidentally, how can one be "at the same place" as another person in the line of succession to a throne? You'd think the entire purpose of a formal line of succession is to prevent that kind of thing. —Nizolan (talk) 13:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete WP:CSD#G3 blatant hoax, so tagged. We should not let this nonsense linger for seven days. JohnCD (talk) 13:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Close please, as I believe this was deleted under CSD. ProgrammingGeek (Page!Talk!Contribs!) 16:17, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.