Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principality of Pontinha

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 15:33, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Principality of Pontinha]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Principality of Pontinha}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Principality of Pontinha}})

Most of the sources mention the nation as a trivial thing in light of the main topic of the source. This shows that the article isn't very notable and seems like it was started by the nation's founder as the IP which created the article has only ever edited this article and nothing else. If notability can't be shown I suggest that the page is deleted. Natalius (talk) 10:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

  • Delete Just because someone proclaims a place independent doesn't make it so. Sources here are largely trivial. Reywas92Talk 14:49, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

*Keep I easily found sources that establish notability. https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/principality-of-pontinha https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/nov/14/experience-i-founded-my-own-country CT55555 (talk) 12:46, 29 March 2022 (UTC) (deleted due to good analysis below) CT55555 (talk) 19:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.