Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro-Administration Party (United States)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:53, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

=[[Pro-Administration Party (United States)]]=

:{{la|Pro-Administration Party (United States)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pro-Administration_Party_(United_States) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Pro-Administration Party (United States)}})

No references have been included for over five years. The references mentioned on the talk page do not refer much to a "Pro-Administration Party" per se, but rather Alexander Hamilton and those who supported him and who later formed the Federalist Party after the Washington Administration. Holdek (talk) 11:17, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

  • Support while there was a group called the "Anti-Administration Party", almost no one then or now calls Hamilton's group the "pro-Administration party" . But see {{cite book|author=Michael Kazin|title=The Concise Princeton Encyclopedia of American Political History|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=fsWLGcZ7pyAC&pg=PA242|year=2011|publisher=Princeton U.P.|page=242|display-authors=etal}} Rjensen (talk) 12:25, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

::The source you site says that there was an, "Emerging pro-administration party known as the Federalists." Holdek (talk) 21:27, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete - unlike the anti-Administration party, I'm not seeing much by way of sources that would suggest such a name for that group of people was/is common-use enough to be notable. Stalwart111 14:18, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep - Deleting will redline references in lists. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:49, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete - This is actually a dictionary definition, sort of like "The War Party" or "The Anti-War Party" is used to describe political entities. The political entities should all have encyclopedic coverage, the catch phrase should not. Carrite (talk) 17:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.