Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro-Lab

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:16, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[Pro-Lab]]=

:{{la|Pro-Lab}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pro-Lab Stats])

:({{Find sources|Pro-Lab}})

This article appears to be an orphan, and has historically looked like ad copy. I do not believe it to be notable enough. Iæfai (talk) 18:11, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

:Delete as per nom. There are a few mentions in the news, but incidental in that it just happened to be the company used in an article about particular testing that was performed. Cantaloupe2 (talk) 10:08, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Delete per Cantaloupe. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:40, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment If there are a few mentions in the news, cnataloupe2, what are they: please give them here so we need not repeat the search and can judge for ourself. DGG ( talk ) 22:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

::Reply

::*Washington Post:Lab Mishandled Lead Tests; Florida Firm Offers Refunds to Affected Customers Washington Post May 8, 2004, Pay-Per-View. Persistent URL unavailable. This maybe one event notability.

::*"The mold broke them Author: Chuck Mueller, Staff Writer Date: March 9, 2005 Publication: Sun, The (San Bernardino, CA)" This is a local county paper. It's about mold which they're mentioned. No idea how thorough. It's PayPerView as well"

::Cantaloupe2 (talk) 02:05, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

:::*This is nothing too significant to become notable. It's an experiment that happened more than 7 years ago that hasn't made a huge impact since. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 16:58, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.