Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Procedure (term)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Procedure (term)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Procedure_(term) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Procedure (term)}})

Per WP:NOT#DICT. I'm leaving the page as-is for now, so others can see its state as I saw it, but if I were to trim this I would remove the "Exemplary procedure" section and trim the "Specific types of procedures" section, which would leave an article that is unsourced and nothing more than an unclear definition. Nole (chat·edits) 23:10, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:45, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

• Delete. Maybe turn it into a disambiguation page. It reads like a very padded dictionary definition and most of the links to this article are arbitrarily split terms (e.g. "electrolysis procedure" vs "electrolysis" "procedure", "medical procedure" vs "medical" "procedure").Citing (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
• We already have this and this and this. I'm sure some linguist who's smarter than me could figure out the proper way to have P (term) become a unique point within this maze, but I couldn't figure out a way to make it necessary and I think we lose nothing by deleting. Nole (chat·edits) 23:18, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
• Yeah that last one is the final nail in the coffin.Citing (talk) 02:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
• Delete as meaningless unsourced manky gibberish. --Lockley (talk) 05:09, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.