Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProcessLab

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:03, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

=[[ProcessLab]]=

:{{la|ProcessLab}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProcessLab}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|ProcessLab}})

A previous version of this was deleted via a proposed deletion (proposed by myself) with the reasoning " No reliable sources; all primary-sourced; no claim to notability".

This replacement version may be re-creation; it might also be considered CSD as being overtly advert-like, and needing a 'fundamental rewrite' to become encyclopaedic, but as it has been recreated, I feel that AfD is necesary to document conclusions.

I therefore suggest deletion because;

It depends entirely on the primary source
It is not neutral, and contains claims that cannot be referenced through reliable sources
It would require a fundamental rewrite to become encyclopaedic

Chzz ► 09:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Delete: although there is an article in the [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProcessLab German Wiki] I could not find refs which invalidate the arguments given by nom. Dewritech (talk) 21:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:45, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Delete Spam duffbeerforme (talk) 05:37, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.