Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prolefeed

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Nordic Goddess Kristen ^{Worship her} 00:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Prolefeed]]=

:{{la|Prolefeed}} ([{{fullurl:Prolefeed|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prolefeed}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

See the article's talk page for the rationale. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 17:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Note--I don't know if you're the IP who reported on the talk page that the term does not exist in 1984, but [http://books.google.com/books?q=Prolefeed&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wp here] it is. Drmies (talk) 01:47, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
and while we're on the topic, keep, following the results of that same GBooks search. The article needs a sympathetic editor; the topic is notable enough, methinks. Drmies (talk) 01:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep. The Google Books search linked by Drmies shows clear notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment: I am not the IP who posted it, since according to WHOIS, the user is from Texas, but I am from Ontario; I personally had never been there. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 18:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Whoops, my bad. Apparently the online versions of 1984 that I searched didn't contain the section devoted to Newspeak, hence I missed that the term is used. 75.45.119.22 (talk) 19:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.