Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prometheus Institute

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 02:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

=[[Prometheus Institute]]=

:{{la|Prometheus Institute}} ([{{fullurl:Prometheus Institute|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prometheus Institute}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This article is about a non-notable organization and was created by editors affiliated with the group. This organization, based in Southern California, should not be confused with the more prominent organization of the same name in Boston. The article has multiple references and external links but when you actually visit them, you find they are inadequate to establish notability. See also: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#User:Tang23 (permanent [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam&oldid=205201211#User:Tang23 link])
A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Related articles proposed for deletion: Rand Getlin and Justin Hartfield --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:38, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Weak Delete for now. I am not entirely certain how to judge a think-tank organization. Right now I am focusing on how many notable individuals may be a part in combination with how often their research work is cited by mainstream publications, rather than Reason Magazine or the Cato Institute, which are generally sympathetic and probably have an interest in pimping this organization. Just on my search, I didn't really find anything and none of the refs offer anything in this regard, just their own website, plus Greg Mankiw and Cato sites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Montco (talk • contribs)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.