Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prophet Isa El-Buba

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 18:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Prophet Isa El-Buba]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Prophet Isa El-Buba}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Prophet_Isa_El-Buba Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Prophet Isa El-Buba}})

The only cited sources are the subject himself. The article makes unattributed unverifiable religious claims, stated as fact. Vexations (talk) 15:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

  • Delete article lacks secondary sources indepdent of the subject which are needed to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete promotional nonsense from an SPA. Mccapra (talk) 03:59, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete — Hilarious Promotional piece for a non notable subject. Celestina007 (talk) 00:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete None notable subject with a promotional article. Nika2020 (talk) 19:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete not the purpose of Wikipedia to host advertisement.Em-mustapha talk 13:19, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete completely promotional, unsourced, non notable nonsense. Eternal Shadow Talk 04:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete - Google reveals facebook, youtube, newsletters, the odd book, and a solitary one-paragrapher about how he predicted a politician would lose an election - not a thing to indicate notability. The article itself is outrageously promotional, bordering on complete bollocks. Nuke it from orbit. --Jack Frost (talk) 11:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:SNOW, WP:SPAM, WP:SOAP, and WP:NOTRESUME. In 2007, we could excuse this, but in 2020 everybody in the world knows we are not a free web host but a non-religious charity. Bearian (talk) 16:59, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.