Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protégé (restaurant)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Protégé (restaurant)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Protégé (restaurant)}})

Please withdraw the nomination WizardGamer775 (talk) 01:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

I have searched the internet and performed WP:BEFORE, and cannot find any sources attesting to this restaurant's notability. The only new thing I've found about this restaurant is that it was founded by French Laundry alumni. Other than that, and possessing Michelin stars, I do not see how this restaurant can be notable.

See WP:MILL and WP:ORGDEPTH.

If sources can be found to attest to the notability of this restaurant, this would be good, otherwise, the article may have to be deleted. WizardGamer775 (talk) 19:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Business. WizardGamer775 (talk) 19:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
• Comment: This is another obvious keep per GNG by a nominator who has jumped to AfD unnecessarily multiple times now. Nominator says they "[could not] find any sources attesting to this restaurant's notability" when completing WP:BEFORE, yet (from a simple Google search) I was able to very quickly and easily find plenty of in-depth coverage specifically focused on the restaurant and published by independent and reliable sources. The article has 10+ sources and should be expanded, not deleted. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
• :Hi @Another Believer. I think you should have expanded the article from the get-go. It seems as if people have to nominate your articles for deletion to get the article to have proper content. Creating one-sentence articles is not enough; please aim to expand on the more prior to moving them into the article space. People have previously advised you on this before and I ask that you take this into account.
• :Also, please refrain from personal attacks and observe proper AfD etiquette. WizardGamer775 (talk) 17:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
• ::WP:AFD: "If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD." ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
• :::Withdrawing WizardGamer775 (talk) 01:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
• ::::Thanks. I propose Speedy keep and close. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
• :::::I agree. I think once an admin passes by they can do it. WizardGamer775 (talk) 16:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.