Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proxecto Trasno

:{{la|Proxecto Trasno}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Proxecto_Trasno Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Proxecto Trasno}})

Probably non-notable software team. All references are self-published and repository links. Goggle search shows no significant English-language links (just some passing mentions and self-published announcements). Despite their interesting projects, this team seems to be too small to be notable, unless reliable Galician language sources with significant in-depth coverage can be found. I checked the connected gl-Wiki article too, this version also includes only self-published links. GermanJoe (talk) 15:10, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

:Withdrawn by nominator - Galician-language sources provided, meets WP:GNG on coverage (see below for more details). GermanJoe (talk) 20:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

I've started correcting the main point you highlight: lack of external references. I hope that the "Open source observatory: Galician NGO challenges gvt support for proprietary software" article make you reconsider the proposal. Other references are written in Galician language, but you can make use of google translator to understand what they talk about. Those links are from Mancomun.org, which is a governmental organization created in 2008 and that did supported Proxecto Trasno activities, and the some of the most relevant galician digital journals Codigocero.com, Praza.com and Vieiros.com (that closed in 2010). I'll go on improving the article. Miguel Branco (talk) 19:09, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Comment - that was quick work, thanks {{ping|Mgl.branco}} for providing those Galician sources. With ref #1 from an IT journalist and quickly skimming through the refs #2 - #5 in Galician (Google translated) with some additional coverage, the topic meets WP:GNG. The other refs are mostly repository links, but nothing wrong with that in a software-related article. GermanJoe (talk) 20:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.