Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychoforeign

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 20:56, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Psychoforeign]]=

:{{la|Psychoforeign}} ([{{fullurl:Psychoforeign|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychoforeign}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

There is no such term as "psychoforeign", so this is pure original research. (Neither Google web nor Google Scholar get any hits, and there are no sources.) Looie496 (talk) 23:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete as a non-notable neologism. "Psychoforeign" gets no hits related to the definition given in this article at Google scholar or Google books. Seems to be original research. Edison (talk) 23:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete--Original research. --Jmundo (talk) 01:02, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete--OR, neologism. Term is not used in the one source listed. Jlg4104 (talk) 01:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Boston (talk) 01:19, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.