Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public image of Donald Trump

:{{la|Public image of Donald Trump}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Public_image_of_Donald_Trump Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Public image of Donald Trump}})

Little actual content, WP:TOOSOON for anything to be added onto this article. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:37, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Keep How is this too soon? Content needs to be added to the page, not the page removed! Take a look at the history of Public image of Barack Obama, and tell me what you see. Ethanbas (talk) 04:20, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Keep. Plenty of sources already exist, so this does not meet WP:TOOSOON. Riceissa (talk) 04:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep It isn't too soon at all. It just needs to be expanded. Nordic Nightfury 08:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 08:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 08:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 13:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

• Procedural delete Sources do not exist in this article, which is the thing we're judging. Add some sources, and I'll change my vote, but this was created too hastily, with no work put into it, and there's nothing to keep at this point. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
• Keep It doesn't apply to WP:TOOSOON. JustAGuyOnWikipedia (talk) 23:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
• Keep per discussion ongoing at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Donald_Trump#.E2.80.8EAppearances_in_popular_culture_deletion .We need a place to park some of the content on the main page.Casprings (talk) 00:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
• Reluctant keep. As stupid and prone to WP:TRIVIA as "Public image of X" articles are, and as much as I'd prefer the establishment of a consensus to permanently kibosh all of them, as things stand today we don't have that and can't judge the article by that standard. I'll grant that this is one of those instances where somebody irritatingly created a "placeholder" page that just consisted of a boilerplate statement that "this is a thing that exists", while failing to actually invest the time in writing or sourcing anything more substantive than "this is a thing that exists" — but there is quite a bit of content already in Trump's WP:BLP that could easily be moved here to expand it. So while it's in dire need of expansion, we have the content and just need somebody to do the work of moving it — so flag it for improvement, but keep (at least until Wikipedia actually comes to its senses about how stupid these are right across the board.) Bearcat (talk) 17:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
• Keep He has been a major public figure since the 80s, a major political figure since summer 2015, and soon to be POTUS. I don't think WP:TOOSOON applies.LM2000 (talk) 22:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
• Delete just a melting pot place to add trivia and bias about a living person, see WP:BLP that don't actually belong anywhere on Wikipdia. Govindaharihari (talk) 17:11, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.