Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz talk 20:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority}})

Just simply not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show that it passes either WP:GNG or WP:ORGDEPTH. Would have redirected, but there doesn't seem to be a good target. Onel5969 TT me 14:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep Major regional fire department with plenty of news sourcing per the above links--not just incidents they participated in, but things like personnel changes and the like. Jclemens (talk) 00:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete - Subject might be notable over time, but its formation failed to generate coverage from major local news sources. As it stands, it can be merged into the articles of the respective member cities. SounderBruce 02:13, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep per Jclemens -- Epluribusunumyall (talk) 06:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:53, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:39, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep. Regional Fire Authorities are generally notable and there is significant coverage. Rathfelder (talk) 08:26, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ambrosiawater (talk) 12:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep based on above arguments and there is lots of news mentions. Peter303x (talk) 22:35, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep per above.4meter4 (talk) 16:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.