Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulstate
=[[Pulstate]]=
:{{la|Pulstate}} ([{{fullurl:Pulstate|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulstate}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
fails WP:MUSIC, whilst a google search verifies its existence mainly through directory listings, appears to have had no third party coverage [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=Pulstate&cf=all] LibStar (talk) 13:54, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:47, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing in the article suggests that either the general or subject-specific notability guidelines are met here. Google, Google News, and Bing searches failed to turn up any significant coverage.--Michig (talk) 20:45, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Non notable 17 year old Irish kid. Maybe when he grows up, if he meets notability standard some years in the future, but NOT now. OfficeGirl (talk) 06:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.