Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punching Out

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Flowerparty^☀ 00:35, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Punching Out]]=

:{{la|Punching Out}} ([{{fullurl:Punching Out|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punching Out}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Future single, uncertain release date and no notability per WP:NSONGS Wolfer68 (talk) 17:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete Dear Article: Please come back when you are notable for more than being released. Like when you chart for 3 monts straight, or something. Thanks, Livitup (talk) 18:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Redirect to Jade Ewen discography - redirecting is usually the best option for songs as they are plausible search terms and have the potential to gain notability at a future date. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

* Speedy keep. Failure to follow WP:BEFORE before considering deletion. -- Biaswarrior (talk) 19:16, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Checkuser confirmed sock. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:56, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment, Above users only edits have been to vote "Keep" on AfD's, and remove ProD's. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 19:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.