Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punching mercury

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete via CSD A7. {{Nihiltres|talk|[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?user=Nihiltres log]}} 03:06, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Punching mercury]]=

:{{la|Punching mercury}} ([{{fullurl:Punching mercury|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punching mercury}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Willydick (talk) 02:03, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

you've gotta be kidding!!! half the stuff on here is crap that no one even cares about, so why not let me add to it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colortunumba (talk • contribs) 02:14, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Delete-No Notability established. ttonyb1 (talk) 02:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Notability is not covered under the criteria for speedy deletion. You must quote a criteria for it to be considered for speedy. Redfarmer (talk) 03:00, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment: It should be noted that, as of this comment, no rationale has yet been posted for deletion. I will leave a note on the user's talk page. Redfarmer (talk) 02:59, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Speedy delete, CSD A7, article admits that band is not significant. Already tagged. Redfarmer (talk) 03:03, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.