Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punctum Books

:{{la|Punctum Books}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Punctum_Books Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Punctum Books}})

A very small, newly established print-on-demand business run by two people, nothing notable whatsoever. Vanasan (talk) 01:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

• Delete - seems to be an awkward attempt to promote a new business using Wikipedia. References 7 - 25 are from clients confirming the company prints their work. That's not evidence of notability whatsoever. The other references are almost entirely not independent of the subject. St★lwart¹¹¹ 02:21, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

• Delete – as WP:TOOSOON. I think it's an interesting project but aside from some interviews of the editor (Eileen Joy) I wasn't able to find much in-depth coverage. The journals were well produced and I like the open-access idea, but the articles didn't get many cites in GS. The journals are new and it's still early. If anyone else wants to check for cites, here is a list.
  

::{{Find sources |Anarchist Developments in Cultural Studies}}

::{{Find sources |Badiou Studies}}

::{{Find sources |Contention: The Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Protest}}

::{{Find sources |Helvete: A Journal of Black Metal Theory}}

::{{Find sources |Itineration: Cross-Disciplinary Studies in Rhetoric, Media and Culture}}

::{{Find sources |Networks and Neighbours}}

::{{Find sources |O-Zone: A Journal of Object Oriented Studies}}

::{{Find sources |Radical Criminology}}

::{{Find sources |Speculations: A Journal of Speculative Realism}}

– Margin1522 (talk) 11:40, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (spiel) @ 20:46, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (confess) @ 20:46, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (articulate) @ 20:46, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.