Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purplay

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 13:49, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

=[[Purplay]]=

:{{la|Purplay}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Purplay Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Purplay}})

Does not appear to meet notability guidelines. Random86 (talk) 08:37, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (babble) @ 21:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Delete per N. kashmiri ^TALK 00:07, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Delete per nom Asdklf; (talk) 18:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}
Comment: some evaluation of the copious extant sources would be appropriate
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹ 21:49, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Delete. Inadequate reliable sources and depth of coverage. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 02:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. At first glance the source list almost looks impressive (by kpop standards) but the article is four lines long. There's been some kind of misuse of sources perhaps. Additionally, some of the sources, despite being Korean, are not reliable (crotch close-ups on one - that always says "serious journalism!"). One is a Japanese blog gossip blog. I looked around - everything appears to have at its root the group's self-published sources. Only one song, apparently(?). Way WP:TOO SOON, at the very least. Shinyang-i (talk) 08:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.