Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qlockwork

=[[Qlockwork]]=

:{{la|Qlockwork}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qlockwork}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Qlockwork}})

Fails WP:N; only sourcing is company press releases and one item in TechCrunch. ScottyBerg (talk) 14:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Strong delete hardly any coverage [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Qlockwork&num=10&hl=en&scoring=a]. LibStar (talk) 13:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete only reference is a wikipedia page that also appears to not be referenced. Search does not turn up anything to prove otherwise. AlgebraT (talk) 02:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.