Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qstom

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 12:34, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

=[[Qstom]]=

:{{la|Qstom}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Qstom}})

I can't see sufficient notability or verifiability here, particularly for a BLP. What notability there is seems to be inherited from having worked on three notable animated movies, but only as a colour artist, which is not really a position that would allow one to inherit the movie's notability even if we did allow notability to be inherited. Sure, a colour artist isn't being the teaboy but it isn't being lead animator either. It gets him an entry in IMBD but it doesn't lead to significant coverage by reliable sources. Awards are listed but those are for the films, not Lopez himself, who gets no Google News hits at all. He has freelanced for some notable animation studios but then so have a lot of people. Then there is the claim that he is a contemporary artist, which is true, but he seems to exhibit on-line only. I see no gallery exhibitions and no Google News for his name of Qstom. Finally there is verifiability. Without significant coverage in reliable sources, where de we get the biographical details from? How can we check things like the birthdate? In short, I think this has to go, at least until he gets more recognition either as an animator or as an artist. DanielRigal (talk) 10:04, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —DanielRigal (talk) 10:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —DanielRigal (talk) 10:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

:({{Find sources|Carlos Nieto Lopez}})

Delete Lack of sources under his made-up name and real name. While the individual exists, the BLP fails WP:V, WP:GNG, and WP:ARTIST. Maybe in a few years... but for now, this one is WP:TOOSOON. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Delete for lack of obvious notability. Usual Caveats apply, however. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 17:50, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.