Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qualification permutations at UEFA Euro 2016

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Per WP:SNOW, inherently non-encyclopedic content that will be irrelevant in 24 hours time. No need to keep this AfD open for purely bureaucratic reasons. Fenix down (talk) 09:00, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

=[[Qualification permutations at UEFA Euro 2016]]=

:{{la|Qualification permutations at UEFA Euro 2016}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Qualification_permutations_at_UEFA_Euro_2016 Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Qualification permutations at UEFA Euro 2016}})

Completely WP:OR and created after scenarios was not allowed in articles per consensus at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football. The article has no use and in two days all matches will be finished and there will be only tables like in main UEFA Euro 2016. Should be "speedy delete". Qed237 (talk) 18:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Qed237 (talk) 18:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete - Original research and content will be outdated within a matter of days. Secret Agent Julio (talk) 18:30, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete - Same reasoning, this article was created only because these contents were not allowed at UEFA Euro 2016 main page. The page creator may well put all that in his sandbox. The Replicator (talk) 18:41, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete: as per nom. The article will become pointless in a couple of days. Kosack (talk) 19:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete - pure OR, non-notable. Giant Snowman 20:03, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete per above. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 20:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete as original research that will be useless by tomorrow. Joseph2302 (talk) 06:32, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete per all above. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 07:41, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete will be outdated and irrelevant very soon. --SuperJew (talk) 08:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.