Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qualified Flying Instructor (India)

:{{la|Qualified Flying Instructor (India)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Qualified_Flying_Instructor_(India) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Qualified Flying Instructor (India)}})

Delete, qualified flying instructor is a rather ambiguous term in use in generic ways. Originally nominated as spam and deleted, recreated and then declined so here we are. At most a redirect is appropriate. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 14:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 14:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

• Delete as not notable or possibly redirect to Qualified Flying Instructor, nothing different about the use of QFI in India then elsewhere. MilborneOne (talk) 21:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker^talk 01:41, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

---

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:51, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

• Comment, why does this need a stand-alone article? Also Qualified Flying Instructor cites no references? Are either of these notable?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 06:02, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
• Delete - not notable under WP:GNG as lacks significant coverage. Anotherclown (talk) 20:21, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.