Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum spacetime mechanics

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black holes may have no hair, but this one has snow. The Bushranger One ping only 21:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

=[[Quantum spacetime mechanics]]=

:{{la|Quantum spacetime mechanics}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Quantum_spacetime_mechanics Stats])

:({{Find sources|Quantum spacetime mechanics}})

per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simplification of the spacetime continuum Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:25, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete Nonsense OR. Gandalf61 (talk) 16:31, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete WP, and rather incoherent. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:58, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete OR Anir1uph (talk) 17:23, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete Original research and nonsense. CodeTheorist (talk) 17:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Please familiarize yourself with our criteria for speedy deletion. Uncle G (talk) 18:18, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
  • This is poorly executed crank physics. {{diff|Quantum_spacetime_mechanics|prev|499625138|The "I will be the first." admission by the editor}} is by itself, even if one doesn't know enough physics to know that this is rubbish, an indicator that this is a novel hypothesis from one person's head, without expertise or formal peer review (or even publication!), in violation of our no original research policy. Being original research is not a speedy deletion criterion, by the way. Delete. Uncle G (talk) 18:18, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete at a "voracity" approaching that of light. OR that should be dropped into a black hole. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:52, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.