Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen of Chinatown (compilation)
=[[Queen of Chinatown (compilation)]]=
:{{la|Queen of Chinatown (compilation)}} ([{{fullurl:Queen of Chinatown (compilation)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen of Chinatown (compilation)}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
:({{findsources|Queen of Chinatown (compilation)}})
Mid-price compilation non notable. Has failed to appear on any notable music chart. Lack of significant coverage by reliable sources. Kekkomereq2 (talk) 14:55, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete only 6 matches in a Google search?!?!?! And how many of those give significant coverage of reliable sources? I think it is safe to say that it isn't really a notable album at all. Maybe, just maybe, briefly mention the compilation in the main article if you have to but it is certainly not looking worthy of its own Wikipedia article. The fact that it has never placed on a notable chart only adds weighting to its deletion. No doubts on this one.--The LegendarySky Attacker 20:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen of Chinatown (compilation)||}}
- Delete Agree with the nom and Sky Attacker. No notable coverage of this release, the linked "review" doesn't even contain a review. Pales in comparison to her other releases. J04n(talk page) 23:44, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.