Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quinn Culkin

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Quinn Culkin]]=

:{{la|Quinn Culkin}} ([{{fullurl:Quinn Culkin|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quinn Culkin}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable relative of a celebrity. Only has two minor roles to her credit. I noticed that this was nominated for speedy deletion back in April, and the speedy was declined on the grounds of "she's an actress". Is this now suddenly a "claim of notability"? Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 19:00, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete. Try as I might, I'm just not seeing any claims to notability. Eddie.willers (talk) 19:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete Non-notable family member. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. The speedy shouldn't have been declined. Just being an actress doesn't make someone notable, nor does being related to someone notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 01:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete No major roles, lacks independant coverage. Being related to a famous person does not make your famous. Edward321 (talk) 14:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.