Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quintana Roo Dunne

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:43, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

=[[Quintana Roo Dunne]]=

:{{la|Quintana Roo Dunne}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Quintana_Roo_Dunne Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Quintana Roo Dunne}})

She has two claims to fame, having notable parents and a notable uncle, and being a main subject in her mother's memoirs. This is inherently all a violation of the rules against inherited notability. There is no evidence that she is notable, and any need to cover her can be achieved in either the article on her father, or on the book that mentions her. She may have a major role in the book, but I think the article on the book is a much better place to discuss her. She was in her late 30s when she died, but the article says nothing about her doing anything in her life.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 15:22, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.