Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quog

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

=[[Quog]]=

:{{la|Quog}} ([{{fullurl:Quog|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quog}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This term is hardly in common usage (compare to "blog"), and indeed a quick search via Google yields no meaningful or obvious references to the term "quog" as described in the article until the 4^th page [http://ebrquog.blogspot.com/]. There are no references provided. Therefore, delete. TheFeds 05:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete as neologism. Baileypalblue (talk) 12:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete WP:NEO, also WP:DIC. Aymatth2 (talk) 22:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NEO Ijanderson (talk) 22:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.