Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Réseau Art Nouveau Network (2nd nomination)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Réseau Art Nouveau Network}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Réseau Art Nouveau Network}})

Last AfD was no consensus. A search for sources found 4 short mentions in google news hits. A keep !voter in AfD claimed there were sources, I did not find any. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 23:52, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Europe. LibStar (talk) 23:52, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
• Comment - There is SIGCOV in this Taylor & Francis book, Urban Heritage in Europe Economic and Social Revival: [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Urban_Heritage_in_Europe/uJavEAAAQBAJ], and I'm finding other hits on Google Books. Have not yet checked JStOR. Seems like the article has encyclopedic value. I'm waiting on !voting until after deeper examination of sources in a more thorough BEFORE. Netherzone (talk) 00:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
• Weak keep I think it has the very minimum notability for keep per Netherzone. — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 00:26, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Organizations. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:41, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and Cuba. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:43, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
• Keep. To repeat what I said last time. Significant cultural network. Enough online (and print) sourcing available to meet WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
• :Can you provide some online sources? Being significant does not equate to being automatically notable. LibStar (talk) 12:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
• Keep - The article and network It clearly has use value and encyclopedic value for our readership. In addition to the Google Books source of independent secondary sigcov in my comment above there is also this book: Anderson, Anne. Art Nouveau Architecture. United Kingdom, Crowood, 2020 [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Art_Nouveau_Architecture/7Ff9DwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0] Also the Wikipedia Library finds these: A wealth of nouveau riches. (2004). Building Design, , 23. Retrieved from [https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/wealth-nouveau-riches/docview/274449158/se-2]; and this: Hoelterhoff, M. (2003, Oct 10). Old architecture is nouveau again. Wall Street Journal Retrieved from [https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/personal-journal-time-off-old-architecture-is/docview/308539572/se-2]. Not sure how useful these are, but I've also found these in a quick online search: The Council of Europe: [https://www.coe.int/en/web/cultural-routes/reseau-art-nouveau-network], Transromanica, The Romanesque Routes of European Heritage: [https://www.transromanica.com/route/reseau-art-nouveau-network/]; the city of Riga has this: [https://jugendstils.riga.lv/eng/muzejs/7/]; Europeana has this story: [https://www.europeana.eu/en/stories/the-reseau-art-nouveau-network-european-cooperation-for-the-enhancement-of-art-nouveau], Musée de L'École de Nancy: [https://musee-ecole-de-nancy.nancy.fr/en/the-museum/the-network-of-european-art-nouveau-cities]; International Center for Black Se Studies: [https://musee-ecole-de-nancy.nancy.fr/en/the-museum/the-network-of-european-art-nouveau-cities]. More as well found online if you remove the diacritic é and replace it with an "e" without the accent. I have no hesitation in finding that the international cultural network meets WP:GNG. Netherzone (talk) 14:41, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
• :I made a couple improvements (and associated independent sources) to the current article so it no longer has just one source. The article can continue to be improved by the sources above if it is retained in the encyclopedia. Netherzone (talk) 16:24, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, History, and Travel and tourism. Netherzone (talk) 16:27, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
• Keep per the detailed analysis, sourcing research, and editing of the page by Netherzone. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:52, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.