Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Chandrasekhar

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Go Phightins! 23:06, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

=[[R. Chandrasekhar]]=

:{{la|R. Chandrasekhar}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/R._Chandrasekhar Stats])

:({{Find sources|R. Chandrasekhar}})

The above person does not meet the criteria for wiki article.speedy deletion should be done Harishrawat11 (talk) 01:36, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 5. Snotbot t • c » 01:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Keep: Appears to be a very notable subject as seen from tons of results from reputed sources, especially newspapers, in [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22R.+Chandrasekhar%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#q=%22R.+Chandrasekhar%22&hl=en&tbo=d&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&ei=RRGdUM_CCMXKrAfvhoFI&start=0&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=e8c762426eb8dcba&bpcl=38093640&biw=1024&bih=653 Google news]. Secret of success · talk 14:23, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 13. Snotbot t • c » 17:09, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:00, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Keep - he's referred to in a reliable source as the "[http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/2g-auction-govt-receives-bids-over-rs-9200-crore-on-day-1/article4089934.ece Telecom Secretary]". Bearian (talk) 22:24, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.