Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RAAF Pilot

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:39, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

=[[RAAF Pilot]]=

:{{la|RAAF Pilot}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd=Wikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2F{{urlencode:RAAF Pilot}} AfD statistics])

:({{findsources|RAAF Pilot}})

This article is basically a job ad attempting to recruit pilots for the Royal Australian Air Force. The article is a description of what a person would do in this job, a list of what kind of aircraft they could fly, and details of the training process a successful candidate undergoes. The article falls under the Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not policy, specifically "Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion...Wikipedia is not Australian Defence Force Recruiting.

The article is very similar in construction and intent to Royal Australian Air Force Pilot, which was previously deleted via Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (prod).

I am also nominating:

... a recreation of Royal Australian Air Force Armament Technician deleted by prod, for the same reasons. -- saberwyn 00:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —-- saberwyn 00:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —-- saberwyn 00:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Delete, useless copy-and-paste from [http://www.defencejobs.gov.au/airforce/jobs/Pilot/EmploymentTraining/], and other primary sources. Andrea105 (talk) 01:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC) This post was made by a banned user. --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 04:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy Delete as advert and copyvio Nuclear Lunch Detected _Hungry? 02:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Note: the second nomination directs here as well, it needs its own nomination page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nuclear Lunch Detected (talk • contribs) 02:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

:This has been set up as a group nomination, the articles are very similar in theme, style, content, and problems, and I think that the results of one deletion discussion would be identical to the other. That said, I may not have made this as clear in the nomination, and shuffled the formatting a little to make the dual nomination more obvious. -- saberwyn 02:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Delete all per nomination - theses articles appear to have been copied and pasted from somewhere, and aren't encyclopedic Nick-D (talk) 06:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
~~Speedy~~ delete ~~under G12~~ - blatant copyright infringement. I am going to go through and mark them. --Shirik (talk) 21:13, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
:Comment Not all of the content appears to be a copy-paste. The first half of it appears to be, and the second half appears to be WP:OR. I retain my delete but it's not eligible for G12. --Shirik (talk) 21:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Delete: (both RAAF Pilot and RAAF Aircraft Armament Technician) as per above, not encyclopedic and possibly a copyright violation. — AustralianRupert (talk) 04:08, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Delete Both, Wikipedia is not a jobs board. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 23:08, 18 December 2009 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.