Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RINJ

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per WP:SNOW —GFOLEY FOUR!— 02:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

=[[RINJ]]=

:{{la|RINJ}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/RINJ Stats])

:({{Find sources|RINJ}})

:({{Find sources|Rape Is No Joke}})

Organization fails WP:N and WP:ORG. My review of the article's sources found only one reliable source that discusses the group. (See Talk:RINJ#Sources in article / Notability.) A Google search was unhelpful. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:56, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete - The group has no notable sources verifying their importance. Facebook pages and self-referencing don't count. --Turn685 (talk) 04:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep - OK. I'll play. The attacks on this article seem to have nothing to do with its content. The topic and the article are notable. The present edit is fine. This page needs to be protected permanently and all edits should be on administrator approval. (I am alarmed at the personal attacks, slander, hatred, vandalism and bullying.) Nymphetamine labyrinth (talk) 08:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

{{hat|WP:BLP}}

:: We agree with that. http://rinjmakesuscrinj.wordpress.com/

We believe that Nymphetamine labyrinth who is writing a lot of this page is another Jewish male like Michael who are in fact male rights activists who have banded together from Israel and Canada to attack feminist groups. CRINJ has attacked and defeated them on Facebook exposing them in every aspect of their lives. We know their phone numbers and where they work and have contacted every horrible scheme they have tried against women of the world. Jews have a medieval attitude toward women. Nymphetamine labyrinth is a self-confessed jew. That speaks for itself. No wonder he is in favour of RINJ. http://rinjmakesuscrinj.wordpress.com/

CRINJ (talk) 05:40, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

DELETE They are women-hating, rape-approving misogynistic Jewish Males CRINJ (talk) 05:13, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Everyone needs to add their comments to this page and get their page deleted on Facebook too. Visit our Facebook page and ask and I will give you phone numbers. Order some pizzas and make a lot of dentist appointments in their area for each member of RINJ. Convince them to shut down. CRINJ (talk) 05:13, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

{{hab}}

  • Comment. Do not vandalize Wikipedia. Do not threaten anyone outside of Wikipedia. We are not Encyclopedia Dramatica and we are also not your personal army to use to "get even" with anyone. Fair notice, I'm reporting you to the admins for abusive behavior. Whatever this other group might have done, this does not excuse your actions on here.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:38, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Comment I'll have to wade through all of those sources. It's an awful lot of quoting from press releases, so I'm going to try to trim that down some to get rid of the quote farming.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:01, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

:*Comment: Holy spumoni, Batman. That's a lot of sources in that article that are either unusable blogs, press releases, or articles that don't even mention the group in the slightest. There's a lot of conjecture, which I'm removing.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:27, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

::*Additional. I've removed all of the unusable source, which removed over half of everything on the page. I also removed the criticism section, as I didn't see anything in the section that was backed up by reliable sources. If I find anything reliable enough to use I'll re-add it, but my first focus is just finding notability for the group in general.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete. After cleaning out the sheer bulk of self-cites and other links that show absolutely zero notability for the group what so ever as well as looking for sources, I just can't find enough to show that this group has any notability at all. I've found two sole sources that aren't from the group itself and they don't show that the group has received a wide depth of coverage.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:54, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable, and the lack of sources shows it. Doc talk 08:17, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete. Changing my vote to delete. Nymphetamine labyrinth (talk) 08:44, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete, lacks reliable secondary or tertiary sources to establish notability, page seems to be part of promotional campaign by group itself. Heiro 08:56, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete - I was unable to find enough coverage in reliable sources to support notability.
    ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 11:34, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete with fire. WP:COATRACK that has been expertly trimmed by Tokyogirl, leaving us with the net total of zero. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 12:01, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

:*Can we get someone to snow close this one? I don't think it has a chance of surviving.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:16, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 19:19, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 19:19, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete I don't see notability here at all. Also Nymphetamine labyrinth, I struck out your Keep vote, as you stated you were changing your vote to delete, making the prior vote null.
  • Requesting snow close. This has nine delete votes and no keeps, unless you count the struck one. I also want to note that one of the people in charge of RINJ (MoBrien, posting under Ruffian Angel) has posted a delete vote, requesting that the page be removed as it was being used as an attack page. I recommend removing it now, as waiting the full seven days for an end result that looks inevitable (deletion) just invites the same trolls to come back and do more damage.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:57, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Merge to Criticism of Facebook. The issue of the rape pages seems notable, even if the group is not. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:57, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete This doesn't seem to meet notability standards. Capitalismojo (talk) 17:14, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.