Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RJ Tolson

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as per unanimous consensus and no calls for deletion beyond the nominator. In fairness, it should be noted that User:Coolabahapple raises valid points, and the article's contents should be strengthened in order to avoid a second AfD in the near future. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended (talk) 15:34, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

=[[RJ Tolson]]=

:{{la|RJ Tolson}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/RJ_Tolson Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|RJ Tolson}})

Procedural nom for IP. shoy (reactions) 19:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

I have no opinion on notability. IP's rationale is as follows: shoy (reactions) 19:27, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

"RJ Tolson is not notable according to WP:AUTHOR. Additionally, most of the content on the page was added by either KickStartWrit or MetaphysicsSoul. These users have both claimed to own the pictures they posted of the article's subject. That suggests that they are either are RJ Tolson himself, his friends, or his publicist. As an unregistered user, I don't have the ability to create a deletion discussion page for the article."

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 19:55, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Keep as the author seems to have been the subject of multiple independent reliable sources significant coverage to pass WP:BASIC. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep I have to agree.The article has numerous sources from independent media like abc and telemundo, I did a quick google search and found even more that weren't listed I assume because they weren't needed for the article. WP:BASIC. Simplespeed4ce (talk) 03:21, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep ditto above - WP:SNOW ? Aoziwe (talk) 13:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment, curious that a gsearch doesn't bring up book reviews from reliable sources, nor any notable book awards, ones i have found have been vanity awards like National Indie Excellence Awards and Beverly Hills book awards (no wikiarticle and over 160 categories!). also that the article creator and a major contributor has contributed to this subject only - [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/KickStartWrit], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/MetaphysicsSoul].Coolabahapple (talk) 16:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.