Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RLDatix
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 23:32, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
=[[:RLDatix]]=
:{{la|1=RLDatix}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=RLDatix}})
This article was largely written by a self-declared COI editor. All the sources cited are press releases. WP:BEFORE does not turn up anything other than PR and directories. Maybe {{u|Rathfelder}} can find some meritorious sources, but I did not. Guy (help! - typo?) 10:19, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
:It needs editting, not deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 10:29, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
::To what end? Why need sourcing here, that's the issue. Oaktree b (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, England, and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:41, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG. A search in google news reveals PR type articles and routine coverage. LibStar (talk) 01:04, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:25, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Sourcing I find is only PR items [https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210922005343/en/RLDatix-Completes-Acquisition-of-Allocate-Software], buying another company, naming a CEO. I don't see sourcing we can use. Article sourcing now is tangential or primary items. None of which is helpful. Oaktree b (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.