Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RMS Titanic II (proposed ocean liner)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow delete. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 23:05, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

=[[RMS Titanic II (proposed ocean liner)]]=

:{{la|RMS Titanic II (proposed ocean liner)}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|RMS Titanic II (proposed ocean liner)}})

no assertion of notability. A mockup and design created by a private citizen, the coverage of the vessel itself seems to come exclusively from youtube and amateur sites. Ironholds (talk) 22:36, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Delete - completely speculative, no independent sources to establish notability Kuguar03 (talk) 00:52, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete - Seems to be a perfect fit for WP:MADEUP. Someone designed a ship in a simulation program, and put it on the internet. That does not make for a Wikipedia article. gnfnrf (talk) 03:41, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Undelete - Additional citations added, include an October 2009 Harland and Wolff Heavy Industries Limited "Preliminary Proposal Project Feasibility and Execution Study for a new built liner." This citation is now added to the article. Mariepr (talk) 04:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

::I can't figure out how that document is relevant to the discussion. First, it seems to be about a completely different proposed ship, the SS Titan, and not the RMS Titanic II. Second, it is not a third-party reliable source. If I am misunderstanding something, please let me know. gnfnrf (talk) 15:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Delete I rather doubt it could ever be called "RMS" since the Royal Mail doesn't use ocean liners to ship mail anymore. Per previous deletion discussions Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RMS Olympic III, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SS Titan (2012), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RMS Titan , this ship proposal isn't notable either. Perhaps a note should be added to Olympic class ocean liner about the multiple efforts to relaunch various Olympics (Titanic and Olympic mostly). 64.229.101.183 (talk) 04:55, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Sources would appear to fail WP:RS, and a search for better ones only gave me [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/comment/4472821/A-Titanic-task.html this reference] to the unrelated Replica Titanic. Fails WP:GNG by a long way. Alzarian16 (talk) 13:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete - Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 14:17, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete per reasons above. —Diiscool (talk) 15:14, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete without prejudice to the creation of an article on the ship at some point in the future when a contract is signed and the keel is laid. Until then, this is in breach of WP:CRYSTAL and fails WP:GNG as there are no independent 3rd party sources. Mjroots (talk) 15:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SS Titan (2012) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RMS Titan. Mjroots (talk) 16:14, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.