Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RS Mensae

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:47, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

=[[:RS Mensae]]=

:{{la|RS Mensae}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/RS_Mensae Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|RS Mensae}})

Apparently created because of an unusually large radius, but the reference for this claim states that the star is a foreground object and likely not this large at all. Otherwise fails WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. Lithopsian (talk) 20:50, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Pi (Talk to me!) 21:10, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Delete. Unusual properties of this star are speculative and not well established. Fails WP:NASTRO. Aldebarium (talk) 20:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.