Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachele Focardi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Rachele Focardi}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachele Focardi}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Rachele Focardi}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 05:05, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Rachele Focardi]]=

:{{la|1=Rachele Focardi}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Rachele Focardi}})

Does not seem to pass NPEOPLE. I see only passing mentions in independent sources. [https://www.manager-magazin.de/hbm/fuehrung/altersunterschiede-wie-generationen-in-unternehmen-zusammenarbeiten-a-f945dbe8-9cc2-446b-a482-c911976af699] is an interview, so it is neither secondary nor independent. [https://www.google.sk/books/edition/Cultural_Agility/mu-Y_96k-I0C] seems to have some coverage, but if I interpret Acknowledgements correctly, the coverage is primarily based on interviews, so this source is also not independent. I also see a few other interviews, but nothing notability-confering. Janhrach (talk) 14:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, Management, Asia, and Italy. Janhrach (talk) 14:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:46, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:10, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

:Delete. doesn't have any reliable sources. None could be found in my search.Darkm777 (talk) 00:13, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.