Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainer Strecker

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Rainer Strecker}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Rainer Strecker}})

I was unable to find significant coverage about this German actor. His name appears in many movie databases, but that is not enough to establish notability. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 16:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and Germany. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 16:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:Keep Deletion unnecessary Servite et contribuere (talk) 16:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

::Can you explain why? WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 17:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:::WhoIsCentreLeft It is kind of a waste of time, or IDK. Just not a big issue. And this article clearly isn't a case of Vandalism Servite et contribuere (talk) 18:23, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:::WhoIsCentreLeft Wikipedia can survive with articles on Non Notable People if it is written in a NPOV Servite et contribuere (talk) 18:24, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

::::You are very wrong... According to rules of Wikipedia, if an article fails WP:GNG, it must be deleted, even if its not vandalism or written in neutral tone. Also, non-notable and unsourced articles like this decrease the quality of Wikipedia. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::WhoIsCentreLeft Two Questions. One, isn't this just a guidline? It does say on Wikipedia:Notability These guidelines only outline how suitable a topic is for its own article or list. They do notlimit the content of an article or list, though notability is commonly used as an inclusion criterion for lists (for example for listing out a school's alumni). For Wikipedia's policies regarding content, see Neutral point of view, Verifiability, No original research, What Wikipedia is not, and Biographies of living persons. Second, how does it decrease the quality of Wikipedia? Servite et contribuere (talk) 19:29, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::According to WP:DEL, articles that fail notability guidelines are subject to deletion. This article violates Wikipedia policy so it should be deleted. Keeping articles that violate Wikipedia's policy definitely harms its quality. I hope you understand. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 20:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::WhoIsCentreLeft I understand the policies, but I was asking about the point of the policies on notability Servite et contribuere (talk) 23:39, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::WhoIsCentreLeft I don't think this: "Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following (subject to the condition that improvement or deletion of an offending section, if practical, is preferable to deletion of an entire page):" specifically says "It must be deleted". What does? Servite et contribuere (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::General comment: I don't understand everything that Servite et contribuere says, but, WhoIsCentreLeft, sorry but no, {{tq|According to rules of Wikipedia, if an article fails WP:GNG, it must be deleted, even if its not vandalism or written in neutral tone.}} is clearly not correct. SNGs exist for a reason, for example. Should you initate other deletion debates, please bear that in mind, thank you. -Mushy Yank. 12:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

:Delete per nom: also could not find reliable sources discussing the subject. /over.throws/^✎ 17:45, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:Keep Added audiobook work and references which brings the article inside WP:GNG. Inwind (talk) 20:01, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

::There's additional material in the German Wikipedia as well. I tagged it for that purpose. --Jahaza (talk) 21:19, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:

• Keep: Roles in Westler, Alarm for Cobra 11 – The Highway Police and Line 1 (Reviews [https://www.filmdienst.de/film/details/902/linie-1 here], [https://archive.org/details/varietysfilmrevi0000unse/mode/2up?q=%22Linie+1%22+%22Rainer+Strecker%22 here] and [https://archive.org/details/der-spiegel-1988-nr.-6/page/204/mode/2up?q=%22Rainer+Strecker%22 here]) are enough for NACTOR. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 08:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
• Keep: per Somebodyidkfkdt. A WP:NACTOR pass with significant roles in notable productions (and also as a prolific actor; see corresponding article in German). -Mushy Yank. 11:37, 21 April 2025 (UTC)