Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raleigh Burns

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin ( ¡? ) 04:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[Raleigh Burns]]=

:{{la|Raleigh Burns}} ([{{fullurl:Raleigh Burns|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raleigh Burns}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Although gets some ghits in the [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&rlz=1T4DKUS_enUS223US223&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=%22Raleigh+Burns%22 news archives], I don't see how they attest to his notability brew crewer (yada, yada) 06:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom, non-notable. -Jahnx (talk) 07:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Littleteddy (roar!) 13:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Definitely non-notable. Might be a vanity/self article. Littleteddy (roar!) 13:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep. Notable, def not vanity article. Need a little more time to compile the information to meet notability requirements. Maroon55 (talk) 03:38, 14 March 2008 (UTC)— User:Maroon55 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Delete - unless reliable, independent sources which provide significant coverage of the subject and assert its notability can be found. Without such sources the infromation within the article is not verifiable. Guest9999 (talk) 00:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete - No independent sources. Chris (talk) 21:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.