Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph E. Kronenwetter
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
=[[:Ralph E. Kronenwetter]]=
:{{la|Ralph E. Kronenwetter}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Ralph E. Kronenwetter}})
Being the mayor of a small city (pop. 4K) and losing two elections do not satisfy WP:NPOL. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Neither being a smalltown mayor nor a non-winning candidate for election to a higher level of office constitutes an instant free pass over WP:NPOL, but the article is not referenced anywhere close to well enough to make him a special case over and above most other people in those classes of topic. Bearcat (talk) 01:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete the local article about him being apprehended is interesting, but he fails WP:NPOL/WP:GNG generally. SportingFlyer T·C 07:24, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NPOL....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't pass WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. GPL93 (talk) 19:44, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete neither unelected candidates nor mayors of places with less than 5,000 people are notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:47, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete not enough evidence of notability to pass WP:NPOL or WP:GNG --DannyS712 (talk) 17:33, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Cubbie15fan (talk) 20:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.