Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramesh Maraj

=[[Ramesh Maraj]]=

:{{la|Ramesh Maraj}} ([{{fullurl:Ramesh Maraj|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramesh Maraj}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Taking it to AfD per the suggestion of the declined speedy. It's very close to a copyvio, but that aside, the [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&tab=wn&q=%22Ramesh+Maraj%22 rs coverage] is false positives and [http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&um=1&q=%22Ramesh+Maraj%22&sa=N&tab=nw ghits] don't provide any evidence that he passes WP:MUSIC. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 04:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete Article was nomed for Speedy as copy vio (but it wasn't) and as blatant advertising---which it isn't. Barely passes A7 as article claims "distinctive" sound. But I can't find anything about said musician.Balloonman (talk) 04:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, seresin | wasn't he just...? 20:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete Falls well short of WP:MUSIC even if non-independent sources were taken at face value. B.Wind (talk) 05:29, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete cannot find anything else other than his site and copies on other sites, no real or reliable sites to use. ~ Cheers! Dreamy § 13:47, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.