Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramon Nomar
=[[Ramon Nomar]]=
:{{la|Ramon Nomar}} – (
:({{Find sources|Ramon Nomar}})
Unremarkable porn performer (fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO). Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Per nom. Tabercil (talk) 21:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC)- Vote changed to Keep, given that the subject now meets PORNBIO standards (nominations in multiple years) Tabercil (talk) 13:42, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. This article is a stub and represents sole presence from Venezuelan Porn actors. Also the concern porn actor is Ninfa award winner, he's related with spanish pornographic industry so, we shouldn't be bias for particular ethnic group Bill william compton (talk) 22:07, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Gene93k: The existence of other non-noteworthy articles is not a reason to keep this one but rather a reason to propose them all for deletion. Just so you know that defense is commonly frowned upon. Non-trivial awards are good evidence though so I'm not going to judge the article itself 65.29.47.55 (talk) 23:11, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm just extending the idea- why this article should not be deleted, first, as the reason is given that this article doesn't meet the criteria of notability, but as very 1st condition of notability says: Performer has won any major award related to pornographic industry, and this porn actor has nominated for AVN Award Unsung Male Performer of the Year(results pending) and won Ninfa Award at Barcelona International Erotic Film Festival which is listed on that condition of awards. I know it needs more expansion, but it doesn't mean it should be deleted.
Second, this performer has well-known identity among "Spanish Pornographic Actors", so i'll again appeal to all for retaining this article. Bill william compton (talk) 08:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep meets WP:PORNBIO. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 09:50, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per reasons above; to solidify consensus and close this AfD.— fcsuper (How's That?, That's How!) ([http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Exclusionism Exclusionistic] [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Immediatism Immediatist] ) — 03:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.